Friday, October 10, 2008

Guilty by association?

If conservatives are going to have Obama held accountable for Bill Ayers actions 40 years ago because he worked with the guy and happens to live in his neighborhood then shouldn't conservatives be responsible for the actions for everything their friends/co-workers have done? I have a friend who used to be a drug dealer, but was arrested and has since changed his ways and is a member of the military serving in Iraq. Does this mean I like to "pal around" with unreputable characters? I got a job at a place where someone was a convicted sex offender. Does this mean I like to "pal around" with sexual deviants? I don't walk around telling everyone I know sex offenders are wrong and drug dealers are immoral because this is something that everyone can agree on. Only someone really stretching for something to harm my integrity would say I have never denounced sexual deviance or drug dealing so I must condone their actions. That's a dumb argument, but I guess the average voter is dumb enough to fall for a feeble argument like that.

Also I find it interesting that McCain has the balls to incite the crowd with accusations of Obama being a bff with a domestic terrorist, but when he is faced to face with the man he is accusing he refuses to bring up the subject. John, John, John, John, you have proved that you are all talk and no walk. You have demonstrated that your bark is way, way worse than your bite. I find it despicable for a candidate to incite the crowd to chant for the death of the other and then sit back, smile, and wink as if you condone what the lynch mob is demanding. Truly this is further evidence that Pontius Pilate, er...I mean, Sarah Palin is not ready to be the next leader of our country.




Go and support the new Oliver Stone movie "W" in theaters October 17, and if you haven't already go and see Bill Maher's "Religulous" you will not stop laughing.

No comments: